Chapter IV Paragraph Viewer
Resolves which verses of a Chapter IV reimbursement paragraph apply to a given patient,
doctor and prescription type on a reference date, and summarises whether the paragraph
as a whole is theoretically applicable.
How to read this page
- Verdict callout — green = no patient/doctor/request restriction is violated;
red = a mandatory restriction can’t be satisfied; amber = a relevant input is missing
(e.g. patient sex unspecified, but the paragraph contains a sex-restricted choice).
- Yellow rows mark verses the patient/doctor fail individually.
A yellow row can still leave the overall verdict green if it sits in an optional
branch — the rollup considers the verse tree as a whole.
- Indentation reflects
VerseLevel; the
☐ glyph marks a checkbox alternative inside a choice group.
- Sex / Age limits / Qual. show the verse’s own restrictions when present.
Empty cells mean the verse imposes no restriction on that axis.
- Req. —
N = new prescription only,
P = renewal only, blank = either.
- EXCL chip — an exclusion verse, phrased as “X is not authorised”.
Visually flagged but treated identically by the applicability check (see docs for nuance).
Read the full applicability docs →